Oct 23, 2025

Latest News From Bick Law LLP

Can Lenders Be Liable for Property Contamination? What Banks and Borrowers Should Know Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), various parties can potentially be held liable for cleanup costs (among other costs) associated with property contamination. This is true regardless of whether these parties were the […]

Oct 23, 2025

Environmental Law & Policy Alert – Update from Somach Simmons & Dunn

October 21, 2025 SB 707 Brings Major Changes to the California Brown Act  Senate Bill 707 (“SB 707” or “the bill”) was signed into law by Governor Newsom earlier this month and will bring significant changes to the Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54950 et seq.) and how public agencies […]

Oct 23, 2025

For You: Highlights of Our Presentation on State and Local Wetlands Laws, Procedures, Principles, and Practical Tips – Update from McGregor, Legere & Stevens

Written by Gregor I. McGregor, Esq. For the 30th CPTC Annual Conference for Massachusetts citizen and professional planners, held at Holy Cross College in Worcester in spring 2025, firm founder Gregor McGregor prepared a new presentation covering the procedures, principles, and practical tips for projects, lawyers and consultants before local Conservation […]

Oct 23, 2025

Latest News From Bick Law LLP

When Contamination is Discovered Mid-Transaction: Legal Obligations and Smart Next Steps Environmental due diligence is a key aspect of any commercial real estate transaction. In an ideal scenario, the buyer’s environmental due diligence will confirm (with a reasonable degree of certainty) that there are no contamination issues associated with the […]

Oct 17, 2025

McLaughlin Chiropractic v. McKesson: Implications for Pre-Enforcement Review in Environmental Law – Update from Bick Law, LLP

Earlier this year, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant decision that could have far-reaching implications for various types of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) enforcement proceedings. While the case under review did not involve environmental issues—instead, it involved allegations that the defendant sent unsolicited advertisements via fax in violation of […]